Listen in as we discuss our weekend and be sure to check out pictures below (click on them to enlarge), and we hope to see you all next time!
~Professor
This mash brought about 3 random movies, as per usual, for
us to discuss. Since we recorded this one, I have come back to one thing that
is relevant to this episode. Relevant in a way that is applicable to all
experience of consuming any type of art. However, in our neck of the woods, the
horror/cult/B film world, one cannot take a movie too seriously.
Ti West is a challenging artist to discuss at times because
his films do not shy away from taking their time and being stylized. Not quite
art-house horror seems to turn some people off and it is a shame because there
is some wonderful cinema in there to take in. Lacking dependency on traditional
film-making, as a viewer, opens the door to so many wonderful films.
The term “slow burn” is synonymous with “I get bored easily”
or “I cannot focus on a film”. Since when, did we as fans or critics punish a
filmmaker for making an intelligent movie? Yes, House of the Devil does
not hit you over the head with gratuitous sex, nudity, violence, and partying;
but it does deliver steadily throughout and I think that’s what has become
frustrating with the opinions held by many of today’s movie-goers. I find great
storytelling in movies (like this) where my own intelligence is assumed to be
present for much of the storyline so that we can focus on the artistic needs of
the film. I can deduce the elements of the plot that are being put out there
without an explanation through dialogue, move along.
Another mash episode has come and gone and I know that we have
stressed how much we enjoy it. The feedback from those who have listened also
has been favorable. All of that positive feedback is awesome and we appreciate it. But
I must add that we love this format for the opportunistic juxtaposition and the chance
to cover movies that we wouldn’t squeeze into a franchise or theme. This
episode was no exception to this description as we covered an 80’s slasher, a
more recent cult sequel/remake, and a thriller rooted in deeper
psychological and philosophical subject matter.
On the flipside, you have a campy tongue-in-cheek sequel to
an early campy gore-fest from 50 years before. It is low-budget, silly, and fun. It did it's job that it set out to do for the viewer, unlike American Psycho. But if you lined up a hundred horror fans and asked them about
these two films, only American Psycho would be commonly known. 2001 Maniacs
executes its purpose in spades but as time moves on, it fades away.
There really isn’t much left to add to with this episode. It
is a movie we have covered before in our Friday franchise episode and this is a
commentary. So, let me be sure to link you to the website for Adrienne’s wine
below. Additionally are a few pictures from our recording of this episode. We
hope you have enjoyed it and please throw us some feedback and/or ideas for
commentaries. Thank you!